AI Law School Tutor
Ryna AI explains concepts, walks through statutes, offers case-analysis templates, and helps you read judgments. This page is ONLY for academic study; it is NOT legal advice.
Ryna AI Editorial Team · Updated 24.04.2026
A law exam rarely asks "what does the statute say" — it asks "which rule applies to these facts, and how." In the first year alone you move across thousands of provisions in the civil, obligations, criminal, commercial and procedure codes; yet the hard part isn't memorizing an article, it's solving a fact pattern (hypothetical) with a reasoned structure. Most students get stuck at the same point: "I understand the topic, but how do I write it in the exam?"
Ryna AI fills exactly that gap. It breaks a legal institution into its elements (definition, conditions, legal effect, exceptions), solves a hypothetical with an IRAC-style skeleton adapted to the Turkish exam tradition — facts, legal issue, applicable provisions, reasoned application (subsumption), conclusion — and compares competing views on the same question (the dominant vs. minority scholarly view, and divergences between chambers of the Court of Cassation) in a single table. On the Plus plan you can upload a lecture note, a textbook page, or a long judgment as a PDF or image and say "extract this case's facts, legal issue, reasoning, and any dissent."
The output is a draft and a study partner, not an authoritative ruling. IMPORTANT: This is a study aid, not legal advice; the article numbers and case citations (docket numbers) it gives in free chat can be fabricated — always verify against the official statute database, the Official Gazette, and your instructor. The free plan handles near-unlimited daily questions; PDF/image analysis, deep thinking, and web research require Plus (399.99 TRY/month).
Why use Ryna AI for this
Element map: breaks an institution into definition–conditions–legal effect–exceptions (the nullity/voidability distinction, the elements of unjust enrichment, the elements of an offense: typicality–unlawfulness–culpability).
Hypothetical-solving skeleton: solves the fact pattern with an IRAC-style Turkish exam structure — facts, legal issue, applicable provisions, reasoned subsumption, conclusion — so your answer is planned, not scattered.
View-comparison tables: places the dominant and minority scholarly views and divergences between chambers of the Court of Cassation side by side in one table.
Case-law reading: summarizes a long Court of Cassation / Council of State / Constitutional Court judgment as facts–legal issue–reasoning–outcome (PDF on Plus), and flags the dissent separately.
Concept clarity: separates constantly confused pairs — right in rem/personal right, plea/objection, nullity/voidability, simulation/fiduciary transaction — through a worked example with a one-line distinguishing test.
Exam-focused output: produces hypotheticals with answer keys, definition/distinction questions, and a question bank of practice problems.
Example prompts
Copy any prompt below and paste into chat.rynaai.com. Each prompt is tuned for a different scenario — try them all to see how Ryna AI adapts.
How it works — step by step
- 1
Tell Ryna AI the course, topic, and level
Go to chat.rynaai.com and state which course (civil, obligations, criminal, commercial, administrative, procedure), which body of law (Turkish / comparative / EU), and which level (first year, bar traineeship, judicial/prosecutor exam) you're studying. This sets the language and depth of the explanation.
- 2
Ask for the elements and a skeleton
Say "give me this institution as definition–conditions–legal effect–exceptions." Ryna breaks the concept into its elements and gives the distinguishing test against nearby, confusable concepts.
- 3
Paste the hypothetical verbatim and have it solved
Paste the fact pattern exactly (on Plus you can upload it as a PDF/image) and say "solve with an IRAC-style Turkish exam structure and note the alternative views." Giving the facts unchanged is critical for the subsumption to be correct.
Example: input → output
You ask
Solve this using the Turkish exam structure: A verbally agrees to sell his own painting to B for 50,000 TRY and delivers the painting to B. Before B has paid, the painting is destroyed in a fire through no fault of B. Must B still pay the price? Note the alternative view.
Ryna AI returns
Facts (summary): There is a verbal sale of a movable between A and B; the object sold (the painting) has been delivered to the buyer, the price is not yet paid, and the object was destroyed after delivery without any fault of the buyer. Legal issue: In a sale of movables, if the object is destroyed after delivery (transfer of possession) but before the price is paid, through no fault of the buyer, who bears the risk? (Passing of benefit and risk / periculum) Applicable provision: The provision of the Turkish Code of Obligations governing benefit and risk in a sale (approx. Art. 208 — verify the number and the current text against the official statute database). Rule: in a sale of movables, benefit and risk pass to the buyer at the moment possession is transferred. Reasoned application (subsumption): Here the painting was delivered to B, i.e. possession was transferred to B. The destruction occurred after delivery and without B's fault. Under the rule, since risk passed to the buyer upon delivery, B now bears the risk of the object's loss; this does not extinguish the obligation to pay the price. Conclusion: As a rule, B must pay the 50,000 TRY. Alternative view / caution: The risk-passing criterion is debated in scholarship; one view ties risk to the transfer of ownership, and under the repealed Code of Obligations risk passed at the moment the contract was formed — a rule that was sharply criticized. So always verify which moment the provision adopts and its number in force. This is a study draft, not legal advice.
Pro tips
- Ask "how does this apply to the facts," not "what does the statute say." Exam points come from subsumption — mapping the elements onto the facts — not recitation; ask Ryna to pair each element with a fact from the case.
- When you need a Court of Cassation citation or an exact article number, turn on web research (Plus) or say "no citations/numbers, just the principle" — docket numbers and article numbers in free chat can be invented.
- On contested issues, ask for the "dominant view + minority view + the Court of Cassation's stance" format; the instructor wants to see the debate, not a single answer.
- Have confused pairs (plea/objection, nullity/voidability, possession/ownership, annulment action/full-remedy action) placed side by side in a table with a one-line distinguishing test for each.
- After writing your own answer, have Ryna critique it "with an examiner's eye — any missing element, overlooked view, or faulty subsumption?"
- Don't fall into the outdated-legislation trap: have it distinguish a repealed code (e.g. the old Criminal Code or old Code of Obligations) from the version in force, ask "which law is in force and since when," then confirm against the official statute database.
Common mistakes to avoid
- ✕Using the article numbers and Court of Cassation citations (docket numbers) Ryna gives without verifying them — in free chat these can be fabricated; confirm against the official statute database and the case-law search.
- ✕Memorizing the concept but not applying it to the facts; the exam wants subsumption (element-to-fact mapping), and writing the definition alone doesn't score.
- ✕Treating a single view as "certainly correct" — on most issues scholars and the chambers of the Court of Cassation diverge; locking your answer into one position without asking for the dominant and minority views is risky.
- ✕Relying on outdated legislation — codes change and repealed texts stay in circulation; not confirming the provision in force against the official source produces wrong answers.
- ✕Copying the output verbatim instead of building your own reasoning — the instructor looks for your subsumption and your sentences; copying is both unethical and detectable when the structure is questioned.
Who this is for
Law students, bar candidates, judicial/prosecutor candidates, and political science or business students taking law courses.
FAQ
Does Ryna AI give legal advice or counsel?
ABSOLUTELY NOT. Ryna AI only helps with academic study of law; for a real legal matter (a lawsuit, a contract, a criminal investigation) you must consult a bar-registered attorney. Everything on this page is for exams and coursework.
Can I trust the article numbers and Court of Cassation cases it gives?
Trust the conceptual and structural explanations, but the article numbers and citations (docket numbers) given in free chat can be fabricated. Verify them against the official statute database, the Official Gazette, and the case-law search; web research (Plus) links to real sources.
Can I study law other than Turkish law (comparative, EU, or common law)?
Yes, but always state which legal system you're studying. If you don't, the systems (e.g. Turkish obligations law vs. German or English law) can get mixed and produce wrong concept mappings.
Is this plagiarism or cheating?
If you submit the text as-is, yes. Healthy use: work through the concept with Ryna, debate the hypothetical, then write your own thesis and subsumption in your own words. The instructor can tell the difference between understanding and copying.
Is it useful when preparing for the bar or judicial exam?
Yes; it explains topics, builds comparison tables, generates questions with answer keys, and drills your weak areas. But the exam tests the legislation in force, so verify every provision in its current form from the official source.
Related use cases
Free — near-unlimited daily messages
No credit card. Plus at $12/mo (399.99 TRY) unlocks image analysis, file analysis (PDF/Word/Excel), deep thinking, web research, and assistants.